The Last Jedi: Nihilism, Übermenschen, and a Rey of Hope

The Last Jedi

Nihilism, Übermenschen, and a Rey of Hope

by Edwardo Pérez

The Force Awakens ended beautifully, with Rey and Luke Skywalker staring at each other, standing atop an island mountain, with a lightsaber between them – held out by Rey in a gesture of respect and hope. It’s such a significant moment in the Star Wars narrative that John Williams gives us a new theme – one so profound, it captured not just the new awakening Episode VII was all about but also the mystery and fantasy the first six films were based on, providing a musical anticipation for what comes next. Until …

Luke takes his old lightsaber, in Rian Johnson’s The Last Jedi, glances at it for a brief moment, and then flippantly tosses it over his shoulder as if were nothing more than a useless, broken toy – shattering the beautiful scene and turning the expectation and wonder into something meaningless and empty (sadly, like most of The Last Jedi’s narrative, it might as well have been a Monty Python skit).

Philosophically, that’s what viewing The Last Jedi did to me, it crushed my childhood fantasies and my boyhood hero with one lightsaber toss. It took a narrative rooted in Eastern philosophy (such as the benevolence, optimism, and sense of destiny and connectedness inherent in Confucianism) and rewrote it into a nihilistic tale bereft of any significance. Yet, like Rey (the only bright spot in the film, besides the Porgs) I refuse to give in to the Dark Side. As the cliché goes, I’d watch Daisy Ridley’s Rey read the newspaper for two and half hours (and then I’d watch the Porgs use the newspaper to make a nest for their baby Porglings).

This is what nihilism does, it puts you on the wrong end of a Vader choke-hold, squeezing everything meaningful out of you until nothing is left, just an unfillable void. The Last Jedi does this not just to Luke, but to the entire Star Wars narrative. It doesn’t just change the story, it changes the philosophy behind the story. Jedi? Pathetic failures. The Force? Nothing special about it, it’s everywhere. Lightsabers? Just need an anti-lightsaber stick to block it. Blasters? Some polished chrome deflects the blasts. Resistance spaceships? They can run out of fuel and be tracked with GPS. First Order spaceship laser cannons? They actually have a range (because the laws of physics never mattered anyway) so all you need to do to evade them is … stay out of range.

So, nothing from any of the films matters anymore, including The Force Awakens and Rogue One, because, well, they’re so 2015 and 2016 (and we’re living in world now where nothing matters, not the presidency, not the truth, not factual science, not anything). Everything the mythological saga was based on has been castrated, left not just neutered but completely meaningless, even the characters and their it-doesn’t-matter-where-they-come-from backstories.

Han Solo’s death in The Force Awakens? Meaningless. Didn’t change Kylo Ren at all (because just when you thought he might be redeemable, psych! he’s not). Luke’s death in The Last Jedi? Meaningless. He dies alone on Ach-To (and, if he really almost tried to kill Kylo as a boy, then he’s no better than his father Anakin). Paige Tico’s death? Meaningless. The First Order just called up another Dreadnought ship. Vice Admiral Holdo’s death? Meaningless. Kylo Ren and General Hux found the Resistance base anyway. Should we let Finn sacrifice himself heroically to save everyone on Crait? No, let’s save him at the last second and strip him of any meaning (because his mission to Canto Bight was meaningless, too). Should we let Leia die heroically on the bridge of her ship in the heat of battle? No, let’s give her a new force power we’ve never seen before (except on the animated Star Wars Rebels Disney XD show – because, that’s part of the canon now) so she can spend the rest of the movie being meaningless.

And, because Carrie Fisher died, Leia will have to die off-screen between films in a meaningless way – seriously, Rian, if you wanted to honor Leia, at least have enough respect for her character to give her a heroic, meaningful death. It should’ve been Leia, not Holdo sacrificing herself for everyone (or let her die at the beginning so Kylo can be more conflicted). Instead, Leia glowers throughout much of the film. She’s even lost hope for Kylo, who she’s written off as a lost cause.

In The Last Jedi’s philosophy, everything is meaningless, except for … Han’s gold dice? Luke finds the so-obscure-no-one-ever-really-noticed-them-before pair of dice hanging in the Falcon’s cockpit, looks at them with a sentimental gaze, and then gives them to Leia later at the end of the film (only they’re not real because Luke wasn’t real, so they vanish … meaningless).

What about the sacrifice Jyn and everyone else made in Rogue One? What about it? Okay, but the Empire and First Order are scary villains, right? No, we can laugh at them – and in Snoke’s and Captain Phasma’s cases, we can kill them off because, meh. Are the Jedi mysterious? No, they just learned about the force from some old books hidden in a tree. The Rebels? As Benicio Del Toro’s codebreaker says to Finn, “good guys, bad guys, just words.” What about John Williams’ score? Apologies to the maestro, but unlike every other Star Wars soundtrack (even the excellent Michael Giacchino score for Rogue One), there was no unifying theme, just the greatest hits served up to every character’s entrance – all meaningless (because who cares about the Force theme if Yoda is just going to laugh at the Force).

Depressed yet? Feeling nihilistic yet? It’s okay, you’re supposed to feel that way. As Nietzsche observed in The Will to Power, nihilism is necessary because everything we value will eventually come to an end (and, in Rian Johnson’s hands, be turned into incoherent fan fiction). Like it or not, it’s what life works towards. For Nietzsche, nihilism is the goal of life, the “logical conclusion” to everything we value – because in order to truly value something we have to destroy it and then we can realize what it really meant. Or, we can create new meaning and go through the cycle again (is this why seven out of the nine Star Wars films have Death Stars in them? Yes, The Last Jedi had a mini Death Star battering ram, because … why not?).

So, when Luke tells Rey that “the Jedi must end,” when Kylo Ren tells Rey to “kill the past,” and when Yoda burns down the Jedi tree, they’re all simply recognizing that The Force and The Jedi and The Sith and the Light Side and the Dark Side have all come to their logical conclusion. But, The Last Jedi takes it a step further: it’s not just over, it was never worth it in the first place – that’s what the examination of their values reveals. It was all a failure, balance never happened, the universe was never saved, nor will it ever be (because Disney needs more sequels) – it was all folly (like the opening scene between Poe and Hux, like Finn’s and Rose’s detour to Canto Bight, like Leia’s fake death, like that shot of an iron – yes, a literal iron – steaming down in a reference to the cult spoof Hardware Wars – Seriously Rian?).

Nihilistically, The Last Jedi’s message is simple: we don’t need a new hope, we need a new Force, a new way, a new anything so long as it doesn’t resemble the old. Luke threw away his lightsaber, Rey and Kylo broke it. Time to find a new weapon (How about a new director? Wait, Rian’s already on board with that. As he recently said in an interview, he wants more diversity behind the camera. Even he knows he’s obsolete).

For philosopher Albert Camus, believing in nothing opens up the universe to infinite possibilities, which is actually positive, as Obi-Wan might say, from a certain point of view. This must be what Rian told everyone when they were filming, to convince them that tearing apart everything Star Wars was built on was not just okay, but necessary (or he promised Mark Hamill a lot of money, because, yes, Mark, you sold out and broke my heart.)

Still, I really couldn’t tell if The Last Jedi was a millennial generation’s middle finger to their parents (like the opening scene between Poe and General Hux, who may as well have been in a Geico commercial) or if there was something more profound going on (like anytime Rey experienced something with the Force). There’s a difference between anything’s possible so let’s see what happens when turn Luke Skywalker into cow-milking, spear-fishing broken old man who’s shut himself off from the Force and let’s look for something new by exploring the possibilities of the Force and showing how it can be shut off or used to transcend light years (like a next generation Skype).

This is what makes Rey so intriguing in The Last Jedi (and, at times, makes her seem like she’s in a completely different movie – or maybe everyone else is just starring in Spaceballs 2). Rey still clings to hope: for the Jedi, for the force, for the parents she never knew (and still doesn’t know!), and for the resistance she rescues and joins at the end of the film. She even has hope for Kylo Ren, like Luke did for Vader in Return of the Jedi. Is this a message Rian? Or, like everything else in The Last Jedi, does it mean nothing?

If Rey really is a nobody – if her parents really were junk dealers who traded her for drinking money and who are buried in a pauper’s grave on Jakku – then what do we need Jedi for? If an ordinary girl is able to stand toe-to-toe with Kylo in The Force Awakens (and nearly defeat him with no training) and with Luke in The Last Jedi (and nearly defeat him with still barely any training) then Kylo and Luke are chumps. Or, is Rey just a total badass? If she is, it’s not because she’s a Skywalker or a Solo or a Kenobi (or whatever other theory that’s out there linking Rey to some Jedi/Sith lineage). Destiny is meaningless, there’s nothing to fulfill.

If we follow Nietzsche, the goal of humanity (after nihilism?) is the realization of what he calls the Übermensch, the super-human. For Nietzsche, there is nothing beyond man – no god, no otherworldly power. There’s just man. So, the only way to go beyond man is for man to go beyond himself. For Star Wars, this means if you want to be a hero then be a hero, like Rose does with Finn. And, if you don’t like your heroes anymore (because you realize they’re flawed and not as heroic as you thought they were) then replace them with new ones. Or, like Rose does with Finn, stun them and take them to the brig. Or, forget about heroes and villains and just do what Han should’ve done (and what the Codebreaker does in The Last Jedi), take the money and run.

In other words, if we’re to find any meaning in Star Wars or in life – if we’re to rise up from the chaos and become an Übermensch – then we have to burn everything down and rise up from nothing. We have to recreate ourselves, not how we were meant to be, not how others want us to be, but how we choose to be – like the little slave boy at the end of The Last Jedi who force pulls his broom and stares up at the nighttime sky and watches the Falcon blast off into hyperspace (like so many of us did way back in 1977).

In hindsight, The Force Awakens tore up everything meaningful about Star Wars, too – J.J. Abrams was just a little better at it than Rian Johnson (and he left it open enough that the narrative could have easily swung back to something meaningful and profound). If we’re honest, nothing since The Empire Strikes Back has ever lived up to those first two films, with each subsequent film digressing into self-parody. Only Rogue One, which had its share of flaws, has come the closest to capturing the spirit of what ordinary heroes (true Übermenschen) can do in extraordinary circumstances – and, more importantly, it exemplified what used to be the whole meaning of Star Wars: having the courage to willingly sacrifice yourself for the greater good of the galaxy (this is what Finn was trying to do Rose).

So, what’ll happen in Episode IX? Who cares? Certainly, not the characters who survived Episode VIII, as the shot of survivors in the Millennium Falcon looks more like a cocktail party than an escape – no time for sorrows because no one who was lost meant anything anyway. Beyond the film, it’s telling that Mark Hamill looks pained in every interview he gives (he’d rather do impressions of Alec Guinness and Harrison Ford) and that Daisy Ridley recently confessed to Rolling Stone that she’s done after Episode IX – and, when asked if she’d make a cameo thirty years from now in some future Star Wars film, she said she didn’t think the world would exist in thirty years – how’s that for nihilism? (Is it just a millennial thing? A reaction to North Korea? Trump? Or is it really time to blow everything up and start over?)

When asked about the Luke lightsaber toss, Rian Johnson admitted he simply couldn’t think of anything else. “What else could Luke have done?” Johnson asked the interviewer, who stupidly agreed with him (seriously, Disney, this is director you’ve awarded with his own trilogy?) I’m not a director or a screenwriter. I’m just a fan who grew up with Luke Skywalker as my hero, who waited eagerly to see him be the Jedi Master I’d hoped he would be thirty years later: powerful, wise, compassionate (and when that didn’t happen in The Force Awakens I was stupid enough to wait two more years).

Nietzsche may be right, nihilism may be the destiny we’re fated to encounter. Camus may be right, too. Once everything is meaningless, everything truly is possible. Even Rian Johnson and Disney may be right, perhaps it’s time for the old to give way to the new (and maybe it’s just me wrestling with getting old). But what nihilism seems to overlook – and what Rian and Disney seemed to have forgotten – is that the way we create meaning in our lives is through the stories we tell and our stories need to capture us, enthrall us, stay with us. They need to create philosophy not abandon it because meaning isn’t created by destroying stories, it’s created by keeping them alive.

One of the greatest positions in ancient societies was the poet, chronicling daily life in verse and prose and narrative. They kept the village alive through the tales they told, passing on knowledge and history, customs and beliefs, identities and roles, lessons and wisdom – everything meaningful to life. As I see it, in order to achieve a true nihilistic state of being we don’t have to eliminate meaning, we have to eliminate stories. That’s what Rian Johnson tried to do with The Last Jedi. It wasn’t an edgy director bringing in a fresh vision to a stale franchise (as his many apologists would have us believe). It was Chancellor Palpatine deceiving us that the Jedi are the enemy. It was laziness, the absence of creativity (because Easter eggs and celebrity cameos do not substitute for character development and narrative progression – yes, Rian, we saw Luke’s X-Wing submerged in water, but you didn’t put it there to develop Luke’s story and symbolically represent his failure and despair, you put there because you were just hoping someone would notice that it resembles his submerged X-Wing in Empire – Meaningless!). But maybe Rian’s not to blame – maybe it’s those of us who, like Luke (or like Obi-Wan), have failed to pass on what’s meaningful to the next generation (that’s why Anakin and Kylo turned and that’s why too many millennials out there have no idea what to believe in except what social media dictates).

Early in The Last Jedi Luke shows Rey his collection of ancient Jedi texts (the one thing Rian Johnson got right, though he probably doesn’t realize it). When Yoda sets fire to the tree Luke worries about the books and Yoda’s indifference suggests that the texts were lost, that they don’t matter. At the end of the film, when Finn (whose rummaging through the Falcon’s many storage compartments is a new running gag) looks for something to help an injured Rose, we see the books hidden in a drawer, put there by Rey and then, at the very end of the film, we see a group of slave children (and the little boy with the broom) tell the story of Luke and his final battle. They’re happy, excited, curious, and captivated by a tale of magic and wonder. Maybe there is hope after all.

Edwardo Pérez is an Associate Professor of English at Tarrant County College in Hurst, Texas. Read Edwardo Pérez’s screenplay for an alternate Episode VIII “Shadow of the Force”.


Star Wars: Episode VIII – The Last Jedi. Dir. Rian Johnson. Perf. Daisy Ridley, Mark Hamill.

Walt Disney Studios. Film. 2017.

16 thoughts on “The Last Jedi: Nihilism, Übermenschen, and a Rey of Hope

  1. Thank you for this review. You are absolutely right. After watching TLJ I searched back and forth for a reason for why did they do this. The movie was made, the damage was done, but I needed closure, or a meaning an answer to why? and came to the same conclusion. Rian eanted to give us a nihilistic take on the SW universe. And yes maybe its an interesting and innovative take, subverting expectations which even those in the end lead up to nihilism. But I still question if we needed this in a Star Wars movie. I know I don’t!

  2. I think you took many of the movie’s statements too much at face value. It’s not bitter and broken Luke you’re supposed to listen to, but the Luke who pulled himself together and overcame his depression for the sake of his friends. And yes, the codebreaker tries to pull up some moral relativism, about how there’s no real good and evil – while he’s sitting in a ship with people who would sacrifice themselves for their friends and shortly before he’ll sell them out for a fortune and his own hide. That’s not the guy you’re supposed to take moral lessons from.
    Plus, not everything that doesn’t give the universe a “lived happily ever after” is meaningless. Luke blowing up the first death star saved the rebellion. Vader killing the Emperor and redeeming himself… is pretty close to meaningless considering Lando blew up the death star at the same time, but at least it saved Luke. Holdo sacrificing herself and the Raddus made sure the resistance had a chance to entrench themselves. Luke stalling Kylo both saved part of the resistance to get back onto the Falcon and thoroughly embarrassed new “Supreme Leader” Kylo in front of his troops. And so on – you don’t save the galaxy with one action. But you just might contribute to it being saved.

  3. One of the central themes in the Star Wars Saga is the inherent duality of human existence. And if everything in the Star Wars universe is “balanced”, then Luke´s own tremendous success in the original trilogy is bound to be followed by an equal amount of failure in this sequel trilogy.

    We therefore see “young Luke” saving a relative from darkness, while “old Luke” (accidently and unwittingly) pushes Ben Solo over the edge, after facing a similar temptation as Anakin once did, when sensing the future. But there is “progress”, given the fact that Anakin falls, while Luke stumbles.

    Moreover, Luke is having a hard time accepting this particular dual opposite (success/failure) in his own existence, but he is not alone in this. Because every character fails or screws up at some point or another in this movie, which made The Last Jedi more akin to a morality tale or even a stand-alone movie.

    Perhaps this new trilogy is simply trying to address the notion of duality and exploring ways to move beyond that, not only in life, but also in society, given the fact many of us today are caught in one polar opposite or another, without political- or religious thinkers giving any clue how to deal with that constructively.

    In that sense The Last Jedi might be closer to present day reality than one might think. And I, for one, cannot wait to see how Episode IX will adress this issue of duality, except when you are stuck in the 80s, like so many fans of the old trilogy apparantly are, because for them this movie makes no sense at all.

    But to refer to this as “nihilism” I think is uncalled for in my opinion.

    • Your interpretation of existential “duality” in the Star Wars saga is retrospective, informed by the philosophy and events depicted in The Last Jedi. While the nature of the Force has always been described as dual in the abstract – light side and dark side – the prior films never implied that a rise in lightness would inevitably result in a corresponding rise in darkness, and vice versa. Success and failure weren’t presented as corresponding variables in a balanced equation.

      The original trilogy stated that the Jedi Knights had been guardians of peace and justice in the galaxy for over a thousand generations, during which time the Sith and Dark Side were at the very least marginalized (if not extinct). And in the prequel trilogy, the prophecy regarding the one bringing “balance” to the Force referred to the destruction of the Sith, the fulfillment ultimately being realized at the end of Return of the Jedi. It did not refer to a balance of Light and Dark, nor did it imply an endless, alternating cycle of good and evil, success and failure. In the context of Star Wars lore, this is a distinctly ‘Last Jedi’ interpretation and philosophy.

      Nihilism basically means meaninglessness – the absence of ontology, epistemology and objective certainty. A corollary to this worldview is that actions have no lasting or meaningful consequences.

      Which is exactly what the sequel trilogy has stated (implicitly in TFA and explicitly in TLJ) regarding the events that took place in the PT and OT. None of the events mattered – not the sacrifices, not the heroic efforts, certainly not the results – because at the beginning of The Force Awakens the galaxy is once again under the tyranny of evil and the last Jedi, Luke Skywalker, the symbol of hope and peace, has gone into hiding and abandoned his family, friends and everything he fought for.

      In effect, the sequel trilogy has negated everything that happened in the OT and PT.

      What is that if not nihilistic?

      • @Jake Great post! And as I can see this new trilogy is taking the whole concept of “balance” the wrong way. They are using it in the sense that some folks think that the force can only be in balance with equal number of light side and equal number of dark side users. This is all wrong. According to the films, it is the Jedi that keep the force in balance. It was the Sith that caused the imbalance. Balance was restored in ROTJ when the Sith were defeated.

        But now when TFA came out and Rey used the force with no training, people rushed to try and justify it by saying she is another “chosen one” and she will restore balance yet again. Though this is not what is happening. It is a fan theory that really doesn’t matter anyway. Because it takes away from the prophecy of Anakin and what he did to restore the balance. If the fan theory of Rey being another one, then it would mean that the force is constantly going out of balance and chosen ones are being born all the time to restore the balance for it to go out of balance again and again.

        This just shows that these new writers don’t really understand what the whole balance concept means. At best they have a very shallow interpretation of it. Like how there must be light to balance the dark. Though this brings up another issue with that concept. It means that Rey being the balance of light to Kylo’s dark as they are linked together, they both get stronger together. My issue here is that Kylo had to train and earn his skills while Rey didn’t train nor earn her skills in the ways of the force. Yet they are both equally strong with it? This is what ticks me off here. The new movies are basically saying that training, practice, discipline, and earning skills with the force is irrelevant. So all the films that came before where training was the most key part of being a Jedi/Sith etc. is pointless. But I guess Rey will just earn her skills through some books and having no teacher there to guide her.

        It is also funny how that in TFA Lor Sen Tekka says that without the Jedi there can be no balance in the force! I guess Johnson missed that part. But he has Luke wanting to give up on the whole Jedi concept all together. Yes the same Luke who was determined to restore the Jedi order. He tried but failed in his quest to start a new Jedi academy. So I am guessing that whatever the future holds for the users of the force going forward will be they won’t be Jedi, but they will be using the teachings and ways of the Jedi but not calling themselves Jedi? Because I am sure that when or if Johnson makes a new trilogy that it won’t start out with a new tyrannical empire trying to destroy a small band of rebels/s Because why would Disney and co. try and do something new when they have a billion dollar formula on there hands?

      • Even though you are right that the Jedi Knights were Guardians for Peace and Justice for over a thousand years, the Prequel Trilogy shows an Order at a point in SW-history at which the Jedi Council holds seat in an ivory tower, not connected to anyone (Senate) of anything (the Force). An Order that ends up being owners of a slave army (clones), forgets its own mission (being guardians, not soldiers), while supporting an institution that is failing (republic) and supposed to change/evolve/die.

        I thought that the Last Jedi addressed this issue by Luke pointing out explicitly the failings of the Jedi Order, especially the fact that they didn´t notice that Sidious was right under their nose as a result of their hubris. Luke admits to a similar kind of hubris, when he admits that he as a “legend” started to believe in his own success, until he discovered that despite his powers, he was just a regular guy, like anyone else, perhaps chew off a bit more than he could handle by starting a new Jedi Order.

        I like this take on Luke, makes him a human being in my eyes and fits fine with me in regard to continuity, because he fails just like Yoda and Obi-Wan and ends up as a hermit. Furthermore, the only thing we see in Return of the Jedi is the demise of a Death Star and a Super Star Destroyer (with some regular ones), but a victory like that doesn´t mark the end of the war, because the Empire was still intact at the end of the movie, although without an Emperor or Vader, so what changed?

        But for the sake of argument, let´s say that you are right and the war was over, that doesn´t mean that everything suddenly is perfectly in order again in society. Take Europe for example, devastating war between 1914-1918, after which people could not imagine something like that happening ever again, but it did, and even worse than the one before. History isn´t set in stone and we will see in Episode IX how the new batch (Rey, Poe, Finn, Kylo, Hux and Rose) will shape events in the SW-universe to come.

      • Besides, I remain sceptical about referring to the Last Jedi as being nihilistic, because let´s face facts: the older segment of the SW-fan base is entering middle age.

        They see Han die, Luke suffering from depression and Leia not the kind of actress anymore, who could wear a golden bikini. And the Last Jedi most certainly is not a movie that follows an 80s script in which women are portrayed as eye candy or being (emotional) support for the male lead (see Demi More and Tom Cruise in a few good men for example). Those times are gone.

        That is not escapism anymore, but pretty close to reality, even confronting people with their mortality, which older fans most definitely did not expect, I guess, longing to see Luke in his 20s again, right after his graduation party on Endor, where we left him at the end of Return of the Jedi.

        Two options:

        – either, this a bad movie, even nihilistic as Edwardo Pérez suggests and Rey is a Mary Sue,

        – or, the Last Jedi provides a mental kick in the guts for older SW-fans (childhood hero dies, no women in golden bikinis, let the past die).

        Take your pick.

        I am eager to see what “they grow beyond”, while having no clue what will happen in Episode IX. And that is what I liked about the Last Jedi, this movie opened up the Star Wars universe again from its preconceptions.

        Which means there is an absence of ontology, epistemology and objective certainty at this point in the SW-universe, but in drama this is referred to as “new” or “original” instead of nihilistic, or not?

  4. Pingback: What Even Matters Anymore? | The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series

  5. It no more crushes the original masterpiece as modern art garbage crushes vastly superior ancient art.

    It just looks like a pair of glasses someone left on the floor, and the SJWs don’t that they are the butt of their own joke.

  6. The problem with Rian Johnson’s interpretation is that it takes a postmodern approach to what isn’t a postmodern narrative. Johnson combines various unrelated and random cultural elements together while deconstructing and rejecting the archetypical roles and narratives that embody said cultural elements. Hence, nihilism, even if unintentional, comes off as the main message he is trying to get across (one may even interpret the shoddy minimalist poster design and edgy title of “the Last Jedi” as symbolic gestures of Rian Johnson’s nihilism).

    Unfortunately, this does not gel with the Star Wars mythos. The truth is that SW is a modernist mythological reconstruction – mythopoeia, to be exact. To do what Rian Johnson does in The Last Jedi would be to reject Star War’s storytelling values. It’s like pretending the play from the movie Hamlet 2 is a direct continuation of Hamlet. It just doesn’t work unless it is trying to parody and/or critique.

    And that’s my problem with these new films is that they’re trying to parody rather than reconstruct. This is why they fail as Star Wars movies.

    Personally, I see this as a fundamental failure of our society. Right now, we’re culturally stagnated because we’ve rejected our lineage. For example, ask most film students who their heroes are. Almost all of them cite that they want to be the next Spielberg, Lucas, or Tarantino or whomever but they never go to the source that influenced their heroes. Outside of superficial acknowledgement, there is literally no passion for or any attempt to adapt the cinematic techniques of Kurosawa, David Lean, Sergio Leone, John Ford, etc. Due to the rejection of lineage, today’s filmmaker cannot understand why something like Star Wars works.

    Perhaps echoing your own thought on the role of the poet, I shall leave Faulkner to explain the problem he felt he experienced in the Post-WWII world:

    “Our tragedy today is a general and universal physical fear so long sustained by now that we can even bear it. There are no longer problems of the spirit. There is only the question: When will I be blown up? Because of this, the young man or woman writing today has forgotten the problems of the human heart in conflict with itself which alone can make good writing because only that is worth writing about, worth the agony and the sweat.

    He must learn them again. He must teach himself that the basest of all things is to be afraid; and, teaching himself that, forget it forever, leaving no room in his workshop for anything but the old verities and truths of the heart, the old universal truths lacking which any story is ephemeral and doomed – love and honor and pity and pride and compassion and sacrifice. Until he does so, he labors under a curse. He writes not of love but of lust, of defeats in which nobody loses anything of value, of victories without hope and, worst of all, without pity or compassion. His griefs grieve on no universal bones, leaving no scars. He writes not of the heart but of the glands.

    Until he relearns these things, he will write as though he stood among and watched the end of man.”

  7. I just wanted to say that you make a lot of excellent points, of which I agree wholeheartedly.

    Everything is now nothing, and we’re all supposed to stand and clap, simply because it subverted our expectations. Oooh, Rian Johnson, you’re so edgy and clever!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s